All observer's points of view are valid unless they become intentionally or unintentionally blinded in the process of conducting a specific observation. In modern science, however, existential physics is the cure for all forms of scientific willful blindness. Western scientists know this, so they have created their own form of affirmation bias. This includes not looking at scientific evidence at all, or scaling standards in order to avoid subjects that make them tremble. Scaling standards insofar as scientific evidence of UFOs is pretty straight forward for western science. The first step that western science uses is to claim that it collectively does not suffer from affirmation bias and is open to all evidence. Then when evidence is presented, western science claims that it is not the correct evidence. The evidence cannot be visual, they claim. It must be something delivered by extraterrestrials in math equations. The second step western science uses for affirmation bias purposes, is the "pop the hatch open" step. Even if you were to drop an extraterrestrial math equation that was never seen before into the laps of western science, they would shrug and say that is still not proof. They will say we will see proof when the hatch of the extraterrestrial ship pops open. This all means that scientific evidence in terms of UFOs and extraterrestrials is a constantly changing, unsettled scientific standard to which no one knows what the standard actually is and who to report scientific data to.
I am asked why I do not take the breathtaking imaging I process to "experts" for evaluation. To summarize, there are no experts. There are those in western science with scientific expertise to readily apply themselves to this scientific data, but they refuse to. There are many qualified individuals who can make a professional judgment about the subject, but publicly and openly project affirmation bias that extraterrestrials do not exist because they are fearful of religions and naysayers, fearful of the fact that there are other species of advanced life in the universe, and fearful of what the social and societal implications of what that really means. They do not want to get caught up in the storm of what would come when the world was forced to look at itself in the mirror and shed thousands of years of its own biases. Only courageous people could grab the reins of that problem when it emerged. It is understandable then why professional scientists avoid the subject. There is also the problem of who has the wreckage and what is being done with it. We are talking about technology that could propel the human race forward thousands, if not millions of years. No corporation or government entity that has control over physical extraterrestrial technology is going to share it with the public, democracy or not. The mere thought of it is antifreedom. The corporations will reverse engineer it, patent it, and make $trillions of dollars in profits from it as they are doing right now. It is their sacred cow, and they are worshipping it every day.
What I am concluding then is that I don't waste my time sending images of extraterrestrials to scientists or anyone the public or anyone else claims to be an expert on the subject. No one is an expert on the work I am doing, not even me. The only conclusion I draw to this point is that we are seeing extraterrestrial life and technology, and I welcome any serious scientific inquiry without judgment.
